Question 1:
Professor Rees contends that the Naxi music enjoyed by tourists is not as "ancient" as it is actually marketed. For one thing, the music performed by the Lijiang Naxi has a great deal of Han Chinese influence. The religious scripture on which much of the music is based, Dadong Xiangjing, is of Han Chinese origin, as well as the style of singing and melodies. In order to produce a marketable "authentic" performance for tourists, Naxi ensembles incorporated disparate aspects of different pre-1949 Dongjing ensembles, both those which emphasized religious ritual as well as those which were completely secularized. Rees writes that these performances for tourists highlighted "unchanging tradition, formality, and reverence" (p. 6), among other aspects. Some elements of performance which are not actually "authentic" include the following: not all of the performers are ethnically Naxi, some are actually Han Chinese; some instruments used are based on Han Chinese instruments, though with a Naxi flair. Rees describes "authenticity" as something which is "credible and convincing" to tourists. Of course, if a tourist has no prior knowledge of a culture or the manner of performance, anything foreign can seem authentic. The mere fact that many of these performances are purposely put on for the entertainment of foreigners, and not for the Naxi people themselves, can possibly make them unauthentic, because the original purpose of the musical performances was to please the Naxi themselves, not tourists who probably understand far less about the music than the Naxi people do.
Question 2:
On the other hand, Western scholars accused Chinese orchestras of being inauthentic, although they performed traditional Chinese music. Rees described such ensembles as consisting of mass-produced Chinese instruments accompanied by Western instruments, creating a mixture of East and West, both in terms of sound and in performed pieces. These performances were labeled as inauthentic and not "traditional." Westerners see this as being nontraditional because they expect to hear and see foreign, homespun music and instruments in their native settings, as opposed to factory-produced instruments and mass ensembles. I believe that there is merit to both arguments. On the side of the Western scholars, this kind of music is not authentic in the sense that these performances are not like those of the past, before the rapid development of technology and the influx of Western traditions. On the other hand, Rees writes that many Chinese musicians have no qualms about calling this music traditional. The Chinese have a different point of view, because they see it as being just another expression of traditional Chinese music under the influence of Western styles. These Chinese musicians understand that Chinese music is not static, but dynamic, with the ability to evolve over time, particularly in today's global culture. Another important supporting argument is that even Chinese musicians who have professionally trained at national Chinese conservatories can agree that this emerging type of Chinese musical performance is, indeed, traditional.
"Ratna Ayu"
This gamelan performance is set up in such a way that facilitates an audience being able to watch. The female dancers take center stage, while the instruments and their players are seated on the sides, surrounding the dancers. In general, the dancers perform facing the audience. From the angle of the camera, the viewer can see that there are a number of different instruments in this gamelan ensemble: kendhang, bonang, gender, gong, siyem, slenthem, rebab, kempyang,The performance is set indoors under low light, evoking a somber mood. This mood is perpetuated by the slow movements of the dancers and the low pitch and steady, slow rhythm of the instruments. From the angle of the video, one can see that the audience is sitting quietly and paying close attention to the music and dancing. Eventually, the music and the dancing become more lively, but only moderately so. The dancers' delicate movements mimic the changes in pitch in the melody. The dance appears to be a sort of court dance, known as a bedhaya. I came to this conclusion because of a scene near the end of the video, during which one dancer was elevated above the others using umbrellas, conjuring images of a ruler being lifted up.
"Gamelan Bali Nyepi"
This performance took place outdoors in a far more casual, relaxed environment. There seemed to be far more many instrumentalists, all of whom dressed alike in white clothing and headbands. For the most part, the players faced each other in a large square with multiple layers within, sitting in compact rows. The entire ensemble appeared to follow the lead of one man standing at the head. The individual instruments were not as clear from the point of view of the camera. The rhythm and melody of this piece was different; the beat was clearly faster. I could see many kempyang being played, and large gongs were also present. From the audio, I could also hear that there may have been a gender instrument present as well, in addition to some sort of idiophone, perhaps a kendhang. In this performance, it was not clear who the audience was, and where they were seated. In contrast to the previous performance, there were no dancers, only instrumentalists in this performance.
